Mixed opinions on the fashions presented raised some questions for me. Some people were fascinated by the layers of clothing, accessories, sparkles and pink displayed (my press on nails were a big hit); others were put off by the seemingly "infantilized" message Lolita clothing sends. "Doesn't it seem odd that a forty-year old woman is dressing like a little girl?" "Don't you think it gives men the idea that it's all right to fantasize about women in such a juvenile way?" "How many pedophiles were in the audience?"
Ethnocentrism stems from the idea that another culture's practices are wrong in comparison to the practices of your own country. Naturally, people from America would think this style of dress is a bit disturbing, because we don't walk around looking like babies and sexualizing youth.
Oh wait, that's not true. Miley Cyrus' 9-year old sister wants to start a lingerie line for children. My 5 year old cousin just bought her first "bra" because everyone else in her kindergarten class has one. I see children dressed better than I do, in mini-skirts and low-cut shirts, tights and Ugg boots, everyday. Tell me that's not disturbing, and I'll let you say whatever you want about the Japanese.
So it's important to understand the concept of Lolita fashion, because the claims made above do not fit with its overall philosophy. For starters, Lolita fashion has nothing to do with the novel by Vladimir Nabokov.¹ It is easy to assume the connection because at first glance, the fashion is almost like Westernized role-playing; people get off sexually by dressing up as scantily-clad maids, nurses, businessmen, even full-blown monkey suits. Who's to say that Lolitas don't dress up for the same reason?
Yet Lolita followers do quite the opposite, actually - modesty is key, and the aim is not to look "sexy" or "desirable", but to look "cute" "elegant" or "youthful." The Western association with the novel's concept can be explained through the Japanese concept of wasei-eigo or "Japanese-style English" by which there are some words in Japanese do not translate.² This is true for many languages, and is key evidence against any associated sexual connotations...(click to expand post)
Lolita fashion actually began as any subcultural trend is conceived - as a reaction. In this case, Lolitas react against the contemporary need to reveal the body as much as possible in order to be considered attractive; in an age where "less is more", Lolitas maintain a Victorian ethos regarding clothing.³ When analyzed carefully, Lolita fashion is not meant to be seductive - most if not all outfits consist of a fully buttoned blouse, pantelets, petticoats, stockings or knee highs and dresses that never traverse above the knee.⁴ It can be argued that there is a subversive side to Lolita style in that "what lies beneath" is alluring and stimulating, but Lolitas in particular disregard those sentiments in favor of what their clothing truly represents.
I'd gone with a friend to the initial model call for the fashion show, where we were given outfits to try on in lieu of runway walking or posing. I seemed to fit the bill - 5'1", the chubbiness of my youth still visible in my face, chest flat as a pancake - whereas my friend was not cast, despite the fact that she looked amazing in the outfit the designers chose for her (she rocks the Gothic look).
"I saw them whisper something," she told me later on. "I think they said that I was 'too busty.' I mean yeah, the dress looked awesome, but there was no way my 'girls' [breasts] were staying put in that thing."
If Lolita fashion's ultimate goal is to seduce through dress, Jessica would have been the first model on the runway. I, on the other hand, am not a desirable object (and I am by no means offended by that) and therefore, I was able to strut the stuff appropriately.
More importantly however, the Japanese do not always associate clothing and sexuality as Westerners do. Japan is known for its androgynous dress practices, as evidenced in their Kabuki theater, history of uniforms , even to the basic design of the kimono. This often confuses Western tourists into thinking that Japanese males are metrosexuals or drag queens.⁵ Accordingly, Lolita fashion is not limited to women. Ōji is known as the male version of Lolita dress, compromising of fashions emulating Victorian boys. Interestingly enough, this style is worn by both men and women, downplaying any associated sexual contexts as well.6 Many young men adopt Steampunk styles of clothing also, spending as much time perfecting their hair, makeup and accessories as their female counterparts.
Example of Ōji fashion, Spooky Couture.com.
This quotation from a practicing "Gothic" Lolita has been cited many times, but I think it is a succinct representation that separates this unique fashion culture from associated sexual notions:
"We certainly do not do this for the attention of men. In fact, the fashion frequently alienates them. Frequently, female sexuality is portrayed in a way that is palatable and accessible to men, and anything outside of that is intimidating. Something so unabashedly female is ultimately kind of scary—in fact, I consider it to be pretty confrontational. Dressing this way takes a certain kind of ownership of one’s own sexuality that wearing expected or regular things just does not...It’s not, as some commentators have suggested, some sort of appeal to men’s expectation that women should be childlike, or an attempt to pander to pedophiles. Pedophiles like little girls. They don’t like grown women who happen to like dresses with cakes on them. I’ve never been hit on by a pedophile while in Lolita. We don’t get into it because it is some sort of misplaced pedo complex or anything..."7Many "looks" lie beneath the umbrella of Lolita fashion, as were portrayed at Tokyo Fashion Festa. There are some sub-fashions that do base clothing choices around promiscuity, but these are definitely the minority. Compared to the Gothic, Punk and Classic Lolitas, as well as the Lolitas who combine their outfits with traditional elements of Asian dress (such as the Waloli or Qi), it is easy to see that Lolita fashion is an expression of deeply inert feelings representing personal identity in several forms.
I'm surprised that Lolita fashion has not been analyzed by social scientists or fashion theorists in-depthly. There is a lot going on here - gender, power, identification, traditional costume usage, reactionary clothing, etc.- that is worthy of more research in order to be fully understood as well as debunk the myths involved. I scoured the internet for articles or literature but could only find self-published prose by Lolitas or Wikipedia information. Even the newspaper articles I found associated the fashions more with sexuality and less with the actual cultural meanings and reactions originally intended.
If you have any further information regarding the role Lolita fashion plays in society and within the wearer, send them my way. I'd love to develop further research and definitely need more reliable sources.
____________________
CITATIONS
1) Jimenez, Dabrali. "A New Generation of Lolitas Makes a Fashion Statement". The New York Times. (26 September 2008).
2) Y-N, Ken. "English words, but Japanese meanings". What Japan Thinks. September 24, 2007.
3) "Lolita fashion." Wikipedia.org. Link to page here.
4) "Anatomy of a Lolita Outfit." Lolitafashion.org. Link to page here.
5) Robertson, Jennifer. "The Politics of Androgyny in Japan: Sexuality and Subversion in the Theater and Beyond," American Ethnologist, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Aug., 1992), pp. 419-442 and same author, Takarazuka: Sexual Politics and Popular Culture in Modern Japan. (University of California Press) 1998.
6) Seagrave, Amber, "Style: Kodona," La Vie en rose, vol.2, p.18
7) MacDonald, Heidi (1 October 2008). "A Gothic Lolita Speaks". Publishers Weekly.
____________________
Further Reading
Evers, Izumi, and Patrick Macias. Japanese Schoolgirl Inferno Tokyo Teen Fashion Subculture Handbook. New York: Chronicle, 2007.
Godoy, Tiffany, and Ivan Vartanian. Japanese Goth: Art and Design. Universe, 2009.
_________. Style Deficit Disorder Harajuku Street Fashion--Tokyo. New York: Chronicle, 2007.
Lane, Dakota. Gothic Lolita. New York: Atheneum for Young Readers, 2008.
McVeigh, Brian J. Wearing Ideology State, Schooling and Self-Presentation in Japan (Dress, Body, Culture). New York: Berg, 2000.
whats wrong with five year olds wearing ugg boots?? They're not overtly sexual...
ReplyDeleteKids are kids, they wear what they want/what their parents clothe them in and can get away with it---Grown women in Little Bo Peep outfits? They should know better.
Call it ironic, but I guess I have a problem with children dressing like adults, in the way that you have a problem with adults dressing like children...
ReplyDeleteThat issue is a separate post in and of itself - but it's not the point this particular post. When you say that these people "should know better," I wonder what you mean...Hopefully you were able to get past my first comments and realize the argument at hand. If not, I'd love to hear your opinions about the subject, for these are critical in understanding Lolita fashion and its perception in not only Japanese, but global society.
I think the idea that Lolita is supposed to look like a child, or as Anonymous so wittily put, 'Little Bo Peep outfits' (gosh. Never heard /that/ one before) is wrong.
ReplyDeleteI'll freely admit that I'm biased, but Lolita isn't actually supposed to make a grown woman into a child. It does have childish, whimsical elements, but I think that the theme is not regression - it's nostalgia.
The style is neo-Victorian. That's a big pointer that what the fashion is truly about is the yearning for a more romantic time, whether it's something we experienced or not.
Childhood is often a romantic time for young girls - all that Disney Princess 'follow your heart!' repeated to ad nauseam, before they grow up and realise that those films lied to them. Society is now pressuring the woman to conform. Get a job, get married, have children and for god's sake don't stand out of the crowd.
It was okay to dress solely in pink as a little girl. It was fine to wear a tiara and proclaim oneself 'Princess Lovely Pretty Sparkles of Doom' or some such. A girl grows up, and then that’s not a woman’s place. It's hedonistic, whimsical and doesn't take care of the bills or the children.
I'll reference back to one Victoria Suzanne in pointing out that, on the whole, a woman is not supposed to live her own life, whatever faux-society's face claims. Why else would it be suggested she 'take time for herself' unless it was supposed that the rest of the time was not hers?
I'll head off the criticism here and say, it is selfish to spend a life entirely for oneself. But I'm a firm believer that to love others one must first love oneself, and Lolita in the west has a lot of focus for many people on coming to accept oneself.
Now, this isn't to say that Lolitas have higher self esteem, since many don't; but it makes a girl feel good about herself. It gives her a chance to capture a nostalgic vision. It is about regaining the sense of self-esteem and the idealised memories we have of that time when we weren't boxed and packaged; we were told to try to figure out who we were. And if that means we wear pink and look like cupcakes? Well, I don’t walk around shouting at people in the street because I don’t like their bra straps or boxers showing. Have a little maturity.
There's also a huge feminist following in Lolita, and it goes like this: such a feminine fashion exists to prove the point that masculinity is not the only way for a woman to be strong. Femininity can be just as strong. In many ways, far from titillating, the fashion makes girls feel apart from a society in which her raison d'etre is to wear low-cut shirts, short skirts and so to appeal to men. Many of these women don't want that.
I'll almost guarantee that you'll be extremely hard-pressed to find a real Lolita (as opposed to one who considers the clothing costume) who considers her clothing a fetish, or dresses that way to attract men. Simply put, it's just not what we're about. I think Anonymous' post, while he or she is entirely entitled to his or her opinion stems from nothing more than ignorance.
I think children wearing adult clothing is far more disgusting, not least because either they don't, or in my opinion they shouldn't properly understand what such clothing really means. They wear it because their teen idols wear it, not because they understand that they're supposed to look more available to men.
Paedophiles are attracted to children, not adult women in petticoats. Our fashion is not a fetish, and 99% of us would be very offended if we were told otherwise. If it's seen as such, then it is not in the eyes of the wearer, but clearly must be in the warping of the beholder's mind.
My dear, I'm so sorry about this epic post. I'm also sorry that this was more of a reply to Anon and the childhood issues rather than to your article. Please do forgive me for the essay!
I never thought of Lolita Fashion as something sexual. I know there are some out there who find the style arousing, but come on, guys. Rule 34.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I agree that children dressing like adults is sad. (Upsetting, not "wrong", as such) They just copy the Cool Big Girls, completely innocent to any sexual subtext their clothes may carry.
And I can never take anonymous posters seriously, but WHY should "grown women know better"? I also agree with Kylix's statement about how our right to dress ourselves in a manner that appeals more to US than to the Rest Of The World is suddenly revoked by the time we turn 18/fill our bras. It does ring true, and it's a shame, because it's generally not women who CAUSE the problems that result from it.
There are so many people who would say "Don't dress like that! YOU'LL attract perverts!", when really we should try address the problem of the perverts themselves.
One must also consider that there isn't just one reason people dress like that. Besides what Kylix said about being nostalgic, there are also those who like history and therfore have a thing for clothing that's inspired by these time periods (victorian and rococo). Some may also like it because they just like the aesthetics.
ReplyDeleteFor myself it's a liitle bit of all. I like Lolita fashion because it's pretty and less exualised than most clothing, also I have a thing for history and cute and pretty thing.
One must also note that there isn't just this overly sweet style but also Classic Lolita, Gothic Lolita, Punk. Some of them don't look all that childish at all.
On another note, regarding the statment that we should know better. I can only agree with the girls above me, I don't see why we can't dess for ourselves. For me, dressing different is also about not mindlessly following the crowd and being more independent (from society's rules in gerneral). I'm more happy this way.
I love how anonymous doesn't bother to put a name to his/her comment. Nice.
ReplyDeleteWomen can dress however they want because they're adults. If a woman wants to go out dressed in just a cat suit, then whatever. If they get a certain amount of sexual attention because of it, who cares? They are adults. Clothing that gets that sexual attention, however, should not be worn by children. There is a HUGE difference between girls dressing like they're women and grown women dressing like "Little Bo Peep" are you say. By your logic, it should be the women dressing conservative, because "they should know better", and the girls dressing however they please, even if that means in something that's close to nothing. That there is backwards logic.
"whats wrong with five year olds wearing ugg boots??"
ReplyDeleteabsolutely everything to be precise, ANYONE wearing them to be even more precise, and they are in second place only to crocks as the worst thing ever unleashed upon womankind
This comment is a little late, but first of all, Ugg boots are really comfortable and warm. You should try 'em sometime, they really grow on ya.
ReplyDeleteNow, to my point. Pedophiles are attracted to children, not women who are "dressed like children." Lolita fashion is not about looking like a child, anyway, though it is often intended to reflect innocence. Also, what's wrong with a little modesty and aesthetics for once? Americans are so afraid to accept things that are out of the norm to them. What's wrong with something a little different? I find it quite nice. It brings something new to the table. We need more of a variety here. Fashion is something that is meant to be enjoyed, fun to wear, and fun to look at. Lolita fashion is fun to look at, whether you like it or not. What's so wrong with that?